[Rpm-ecosystem] libhif, and grand plans

Neal Gompa ngompa13 at gmail.com
Fri Jul 24 14:07:30 UTC 2015

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Richard Hughes <hughsient at gmail.com>

> On 13 July 2015 at 15:41, Daniel Mach <dmach at redhat.com> wrote:
> > If libhif should merge everything into a big blob without clearly scoped
> > interfaces, then we're in disagreement.
> I think we're in agreement I think :)
​If the interfaces are cleanly available (such that applicable libraries
can be used in non-RPM systems as desired), and everything (including
libhif) is using CMake (which makes it much easier to integrate into other
projects), then I'm okay with this.​

> > All these should be available via Python interfaces.
> Classic python, or GObjectIntrospection?
​Which one would be easier to maintain and provide interfaces in Python 3
over time?​

> Richard.
> _______________________________________________
> Rpm-ecosystem mailing list
> Rpm-ecosystem at lists.rpm.org
> http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-ecosystem

真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-ecosystem/attachments/20150724/0a4713b6/attachment.html>

More information about the Rpm-ecosystem mailing list