[Rpm-ecosystem] libhif, and grand plans

Radek Holy rholy at redhat.com
Fri Jul 24 15:02:29 UTC 2015

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Hughes" <hughsient at gmail.com>
> To: rpm-ecosystem at lists.rpm.org
> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 4:55:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] libhif, and grand plans
> On 24 July 2015 at 15:49, Radek Holy <rholy at redhat.com> wrote:
> > What does the *I* mean?
> I'm sorry if I overstepped the mark, but the "I" was ferrerring to the
> person that's doing the majority of work on libhif. I kinda consider
> myself an experienced maintainer, and if there's one thing projects
> like HAL taught me was that feature creep is the real enemy of a
> project. Having a tightly defined scope means the library does one
> thing, and does it well, and means we can actually test the interface
> that we're expecting people to consume.
> Richard.

Well, I have no problem with tight scopes. My question just reflects my feeling of these "grand plans". So far it seems that it is something what *you* need, not what the community needs. And according to your previous answer it still feels like that *you* are the only one who will make decisions regarding the that new bundle in the future.
Radek Holý
Associate Software Engineer
Software Management Team
Red Hat Czech

More information about the Rpm-ecosystem mailing list