[Rpm-ecosystem] libhif, and grand plans
rholy at redhat.com
Fri Jul 24 15:02:29 UTC 2015
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Hughes" <hughsient at gmail.com>
> To: rpm-ecosystem at lists.rpm.org
> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 4:55:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] libhif, and grand plans
> On 24 July 2015 at 15:49, Radek Holy <rholy at redhat.com> wrote:
> > What does the *I* mean?
> I'm sorry if I overstepped the mark, but the "I" was ferrerring to the
> person that's doing the majority of work on libhif. I kinda consider
> myself an experienced maintainer, and if there's one thing projects
> like HAL taught me was that feature creep is the real enemy of a
> project. Having a tightly defined scope means the library does one
> thing, and does it well, and means we can actually test the interface
> that we're expecting people to consume.
Well, I have no problem with tight scopes. My question just reflects my feeling of these "grand plans". So far it seems that it is something what *you* need, not what the community needs. And according to your previous answer it still feels like that *you* are the only one who will make decisions regarding the that new bundle in the future.
Associate Software Engineer
Software Management Team
Red Hat Czech
More information about the Rpm-ecosystem