Moderation test

[Jeff Johnson]

On Dec 17, 2008, at 10:51 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:

> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, devzero2000 wrote:
>
>> What is the meaning of this ?
>>
>>      Are truly rpm.org mailing list only for rpm-4-6 member, and, for
>>      it is more, only for Fedora, and not for "rpm" (quoted) user ?
>>      If so, please tell. Probably it is, but it hope it not. But,
>>      refusing jbj (Jeff Johnson) or giving it problem to contribuite
>>      at this lists, not it is a good thing for me (and for rpm imho).
>>
>>
>>
>>      Panu, please, tell what is your position on this topic.
>
> This list is for discussion about rpm.org releases, as quite  
> explicitly
> stated when this list moved to the current location:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/rpm-list/2008-October/msg00022.html
>
> I've zero wish to moderate but will do so if that's what it takes to  
> keep
> the users and developers of the other rpm version on-topic on this  
> list.
>

So "on-topic" is the reason for moderation.

Please point to the item that was not on-topic so that I may conform
to list policies.

Publically so that others too may more easily have an example of
the existing <rpm-list at rpm.org> relevancy criteria.

73 de Jeff
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4664 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-list/attachments/20081217/82a8bc55/attachment.bin