n3npq at mac.com
Wed Dec 17 15:57:59 UTC 2008
On Dec 17, 2008, at 10:51 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, devzero2000 wrote:
>> What is the meaning of this ?
>> Are truly rpm.org mailing list only for rpm-4-6 member, and, for
>> it is more, only for Fedora, and not for "rpm" (quoted) user ?
>> If so, please tell. Probably it is, but it hope it not. But,
>> refusing jbj (Jeff Johnson) or giving it problem to contribuite
>> at this lists, not it is a good thing for me (and for rpm imho).
>> Panu, please, tell what is your position on this topic.
> This list is for discussion about rpm.org releases, as quite
> stated when this list moved to the current location:
> I've zero wish to moderate but will do so if that's what it takes to
> the users and developers of the other rpm version on-topic on this
So "on-topic" is the reason for moderation.
Please point to the item that was not on-topic so that I may conform
to list policies.
Publically so that others too may more easily have an example of
the existing <rpm-list at rpm.org> relevancy criteria.
73 de Jeff
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4664 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-list/attachments/20081217/82a8bc55/attachment.bin
More information about the Rpm-list