RPM or YUM does not support interactive license agreement

Greg Swift gregswift at gmail.com
Wed Sep 19 04:12:35 UTC 2012


Confirmed.  One of the precepts from the Fedora/Red Hat side of things is
that software installation should always be possible completely unattended.
I'd assume the other RPM based distros agree based on current state of
affairs.
On Sep 18, 2012 10:02 PM, "jupiter" <jupiter.hce at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I added a bash read to rpm spec, it did not work during the package
> installation. I then found there was a discussion in
> http://www.oldrpm.org/hintskinks/interactive/ many years ago. Could
> anyone kindly confirm that the current RPM is still not supporting
> (will never support) interactive license agreement?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jupiter
> _______________________________________________
> Rpm-list mailing list
> Rpm-list at lists.rpm.org
> http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-list/attachments/20120918/dbb632bc/attachment.html>


More information about the Rpm-list mailing list