RPM or YUM does not support interactive license agreement

jupiter jupiter.hce at gmail.com
Wed Sep 19 09:46:13 UTC 2012

Thanks Greg, appreciate your comments.



On 9/19/12, Greg Swift <gregswift at gmail.com> wrote:
> Confirmed.  One of the precepts from the Fedora/Red Hat side of things is
> that software installation should always be possible completely unattended.
> I'd assume the other RPM based distros agree based on current state of
> affairs.
> On Sep 18, 2012 10:02 PM, "jupiter" <jupiter.hce at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I added a bash read to rpm spec, it did not work during the package
>> installation. I then found there was a discussion in
>> http://www.oldrpm.org/hintskinks/interactive/ many years ago. Could
>> anyone kindly confirm that the current RPM is still not supporting
>> (will never support) interactive license agreement?
>> Thank you.
>> Kind regards,
>> Jupiter
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rpm-list mailing list
>> Rpm-list at lists.rpm.org
>> http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

More information about the Rpm-list mailing list