Versioning issue

marcus young 3vilpenguin at gmail.com
Fri Mar 7 22:49:54 UTC 2014


  Turns out the latter had no epoch while the first did. :(
 ------------------------------
From: Greg Swift <gregswift at gmail.com>
Sent: 3/7/2014 4:46 PM
To: General discussion about the RPM package manager<rpm-list at lists.rpm.org>
Subject: Re: Versioning issue

Can you provide the output of this for both of those packages:

rpm -qp --qf '%{name}-%{version}-%{release}' <filename>


On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Marc Young <3vilpenguin at gmail.com> wrote:

> I use symantic versioning to build our RPMs from jenkins from source
> automatically. 'Stable' releases are straight symvers (1.1.0-beta.1, etc).
> 'Dev' or 'unstable' append the datetime such as
> '1.2.0-beta.1.140215223311'. It almost always works. Sometimes it doesn't.
> According to rpmdev-vercmp, they should work when they don't. An example of
> a time yum refuses to update:
>
> http://fpaste.org/83452/raw/
>
> Any help is appreciated, i'd rather not have to change the versioning
> scheme if not required, it's nice to have it match the versioning scheme we
> have in house by default.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rpm-list mailing list
> Rpm-list at lists.rpm.org
> http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-list/attachments/20140307/b618b745/attachment.html>


More information about the Rpm-list mailing list