[Rpm-maint] Promoting popt
jbowes at redhat.com
Sun Dec 17 19:58:44 UTC 2006
Peter Bowen wrote:
> I think it is time we gave popt a promotion. He has worked tirelessly
> under the tutelage of rpm for a number of years, never getting full
> recognition. I think that James has already removed the popt directory
> in his tree, but if we commit that as-is, we will loose popt. Since the
> hg tree just go reorganized to allow for maximum rpm along side rpm, I
> would suggest adding popt alongside.
> Does this make sense?
I like it. Maybe the same could be done with language bindings?
More information about the Rpm-maint