[Rpm-maint] Promoting popt

James Bowes jbowes at redhat.com
Sun Dec 17 19:58:44 UTC 2006

Peter Bowen wrote:
> I think it is time we gave popt a promotion.  He has worked tirelessly
> under the tutelage of rpm for a number of years, never getting full
> recognition.  I think that James has already removed the popt directory
> in his tree, but if we commit that as-is, we will loose popt.  Since the
> hg tree just go reorganized to allow for maximum rpm along side rpm, I
> would suggest adding popt alongside.
> Does this make sense?

I like it. Maybe the same could be done with language bindings?


More information about the Rpm-maint mailing list