[Rpm-maint] Re: [lsb-discuss] [packaging] RFC: Berlin Packaging API
robert.schweikert at mathworks.com
Thu Feb 28 14:10:53 UTC 2008
Reality is that there is more to the computing world than Linux. No
matter how much we wish for Linux being the only thing that matters we
have to live with the fact that customers expect support on Windoze,
Solaris, Mac OS X, AIX, etc. As Scott pointed out, for ISVs cross
platform is not equal cross distro.
While the web is becoming more dominant there are many applications that
will continue to follow the traditional distribution model of providing
some sort of media to their customers. Therefore, it is only logical
that one wants an installer that basically works the same on all
platforms with a backend that stores the binaries in a portable format
such as zip. The packaging formats for Linux (deb and rpm) don't meet
this requirement, thus these formats are not suitable for this purpose.
Further as Jeff pointed out one has to be root to install packages in
rpm or deb format. ISVs MUST have the option to let their customers
install an application without root access.
Being able to tell the underlying system what is being installed and
where it is being installed is a convenience for the user and/or the
system administrator. ISVs are installing their software on Linux today
without using deb and/or rpm and this is working OK. However, as was
discussed in Berlin providing a way to interface with the packaging
system is a great feature and would improve the user experience.
Jeff summarized the requirements from an ISV perspective well and as far
as I can tell these requirements have not changed since the Berlin
meeting. Having this API provides an opportunity for us to lower the
entry hurdle for ISVs in letting ISVs keep their cross platform
packaging mechanism while at the same time providing a certain level of
integration such that ISV apps can be treated more like first class
citizens from a package management perspective.
Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Jeff Licquia <jeff at licquia.org> wrote:
>> This page now contains a straw-man API proposal. My intent is to
>> implement this proposal for RPM and dpkg once it passes muster, and
>> propose the API for inclusion into RPM and dpkg.
> First, I''m not sure I agree that anything like this is needed.
> Second, even if it is needed, I would have assumed that
> a commandline interface would be more appropriate.
> lsb-discuss mailing list
> lsb-discuss at lists.linux-foundation.org
Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU
(robert.schweikert at mathworks.com) LINUX
The MathWorks Inc.
Phone : 508-647-2042
More information about the Rpm-maint