[Rpm-maint] [draft] spec file unification: autotools based projects
notting at redhat.com
Thu Jul 17 17:11:17 UTC 2008
Hans de Goede (j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl) said:
> I agree, blindly calling autoreconf is BAD really really BAD (take it
> from someone who maintanis 200 packages). Often the autoreconf input
> files were written for different versions of autofoo then are available
> in the buildsys, also as Ralf says this goes against the design
> principles of autofoo. I've often taken over packages from other people,
> and removed calling autoreconf and instead patch both the .am and .in
> manually (so that if autoreconf ever gets called again the patch sticks
> around), fixing many bugs that way.
I agree as well - I'm not saying you *can't* call autoreconf if
you want to/need to and have tested it, but it should *not* be
policy to do so.
More information about the Rpm-maint