[Rpm-maint] Re: [packaging] LSB Package API

Dan Kegel dank at kegel.com
Sun Jun 22 20:34:31 UTC 2008


On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Denis Washington <dwashington at gmx.net> wrote:
> I don't think this is a corner case at all. For one thing, propietary
> applications might just don't play a role _because_ there is no really
> good distribution method for them - the typical chicken-and-egg problem.
> (I'm not saying this is the only reason, but an important one.) We're
> just not giving them an easy method of cross-distro integration. I think
> providing this is important.

Sure, and that's why I support the LSB.
Has everybody else given up on it?
- Dan



More information about the Rpm-maint mailing list