[Rpm-maint] relicensing for Maximum RPM

Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi
Thu Aug 13 13:38:01 UTC 2009


On Friday 10 July 2009, Karsten Wade wrote:

> Essentially, I'd like to get your consensus that as Fedora Docs folks
> work on max-rpm, they can go ahead and relicense the content to CC BY
> SA 3.0.  In fact, I would recommend that be the first and a single
> change made in the source repo by the docs person, making it clear
> follow-on contributions are licensed under the CC BY SA.

Speaking for myself only; I have no problem with that, in fact I welcome the 
change.  If my permission is required, and even if not: you are welcome to 
relicense my work on the Maximum RPM under the CC BY SA 3.0.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20090813/c98e753f/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Rpm-maint mailing list