[Rpm-maint] [PATCH] - create an argwarning() (so it can be expanded on later if necessary) - emit obnoxious warnings if people using --force or --nodeps
skvidal at fedoraproject.org
Thu Jul 29 15:15:02 UTC 2010
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 17:14 +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:07:58AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 18:22 +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> > > No, it's currently quite stable. We had some crashes in the
> > > Berkeleydb code in the past, it's nice to run 'rpm --rebuilddb'
> > > when the error pops up and retry the rpm call.
> > >
> > > (I think that's also how debian's apt works, it calls dpkg to
> > > do the real installation work.)
> > how does running the elements as separate install processes work for
> > multilib files or for certain kinds of obsoletes?
> Actually I don't know of any problems. I know that the rpm puts
> the erase TEs at the end of the transaction to solve some issue,
> but I don't know the exact reason for that.
What about %posttrans?
More information about the Rpm-maint