[Rpm-maint] lua extension API stability
pmatilai at laiskiainen.org
Mon Jun 6 07:38:20 UTC 2011
On 06/04/2011 11:16 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> I'm considering using lua in some scriptlets, and noticed that while
> posix.symlink() currently exists in the posix extension included with
> rpm, it no longer exists in the current upstream version, there's a 3rd
> argument to posix.link() instead for that purpose:
> Are the lua APIs available to package scriptlets in rpm going to be kept
> backwards compatible?
Yes. The posix extension embedded in rpm is and will remain a fork: rpm
needs to limit what functionality is available through the posix
extensions in order to protect itself, and also to protect package
scriptlets against changes like this.
The tougher question is going to be what to do if/when Lua introduces
dramatically incompatible changes in the language itself.
- Panu -
More information about the Rpm-maint