[Rpm-maint] PATCH 1/2013 Take rid of redefinitions of __BEGIN_DECLS and __END_DECLS

Panu Matilainen pmatilai at laiskiainen.org
Mon Aug 19 12:17:11 UTC 2013

On 08/16/2013 03:26 PM, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> Hello!
> Yes, this looks better to introduce, into the RPM code. But as it's
> already defined by C libraries, I would use another names, like
> What do you think?

As for the prototype part, adding preprocessor goo for pre-ANSI C 
compiler compatibility makes no sense whatsoever, rpm explicitly 
requires a C99 compiler since several years.

As for RPM_BEGIN_DECLS/RPM_END_DECLS, those already exist but not 
actually used... simply because nobody has bothered switching all the 
headers to include and use the variants from <rpm/rpmutil.h> :)

	- Panu -

More information about the Rpm-maint mailing list