[Rpm-maint] RFC: experiments with rich dependencies
ffesti at redhat.com
Thu Sep 11 13:02:15 UTC 2014
On 09/11/2014 02:51 PM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> Ah, but I was hoping for a discussion of the syntax. Are you ok with
> the enclosing the rich deps with ()? What about the op names, I'd
> love to use & as 'and' and | as 'or' (which also makes it more like
> Debian), but I can't think of any good charater for 'if'.
Formally the sign would be "<-" (reverse implication). But I kinda doubt
that most people would get that.
Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/ Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael
O'Neill, Charles Peters
More information about the Rpm-maint