[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Don't insert rpmlib() dependencies for dynamic buildrequires (#878)

Panu Matilainen notifications at github.com
Fri Oct 4 10:34:00 UTC 2019


/me -monologue continues...

The minimal change solution to the contains-issue would probably be moving the existing rpmlib() dependency to a weak dependency tag. We don't have BuildRecommends: in specs but nothing stops us from inserting such dependencies into src.rpm headers, and nothing stops anybody from querying them from there. I don't like that option because the rpmlib() dependency is wrong to begin with, but to enumerate our options...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/878#issuecomment-538344379
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20191004/f0fcce00/attachment.html>


More information about the Rpm-maint mailing list