[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fix support of MIPS r6 (#916)

YunQiang Su notifications at github.com
Tue Oct 29 07:42:49 UTC 2019


> I do not see why this is necessary, it looks like leaking debianism into RPM. I tried to bootstrap a couple 
yes. it is debianism. I hope that the Fedora keeps same with Debian if possible.

> of r6 Fedora packages and they work just fine with the current setup. The `-gnuabi` and GCC arch translation is solved by macros, I believe the GCC and RPM architecture names are not tied in any way (please correct me if I am wrong). And TBH `mips64r6el` is already way too long for an architecture name, I do not think making it even longer is a good idea.

The rpm architecture is quite tied with the GCC triple's `CPU` section.
If we wish the archname to be shorter, we have to patch `rpm'.
    https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/86b698d546663068b0f11539180701e669769827/build/parseSpec.c#L726

Is there 2 architecture conception?
One is internal rpm: for example armhf, 
and one is in the filename of rpm packages, like arm7vl?


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/916#issuecomment-547295511
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20191029/fb989d69/attachment.html>


More information about the Rpm-maint mailing list