[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Handle Python extras trough reverse requirements encoded in provides (#1061)

Miro Hrončok notifications at github.com
Mon Feb 10 12:37:15 UTC 2020

Note that the subpackages approach has a problem if an extra goes away and it was installed on user machine.

Obviously, if we loose extras that are still dependent on, any approach will generate broken dependencies; but with subpckages, any removed subpackages will need to be obsoleted, and I'm afraid that any rpm level automation cannot possibly have knowledge about "subpackages in the past".

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20200210/019b9d4f/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Rpm-maint mailing list