[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Handle Python extras trough reverse requirements encoded in provides (#1061)

Miro Hrončok notifications at github.com
Mon Feb 10 12:37:15 UTC 2020


Note that the subpackages approach has a problem if an extra goes away and it was installed on user machine.

Obviously, if we loose extras that are still dependent on, any approach will generate broken dependencies; but with subpckages, any removed subpackages will need to be obsoleted, and I'm afraid that any rpm level automation cannot possibly have knowledge about "subpackages in the past".

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1061#issuecomment-584102311
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20200210/019b9d4f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Rpm-maint mailing list