[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Handle Python extras trough reverse requirements encoded in provides (#1061)

Gordon Messmer notifications at github.com
Wed Feb 12 21:22:58 UTC 2020

> Note that the subpackages approach has a problem if an extra goes away and it was installed on user machine.

Maybe not a *huge* concern... setuptools' documentation tells developers not to do that.

https://setuptools.readthedocs.io/en/latest/setuptools.html#declaring-extras-optional-features-with-their-own-dependencies  (final paragraph)

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20200212/302a6d73/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Rpm-maint mailing list