[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Introduce a new qualifier for meta dependencies (RhBug:1648721) (#1028)

[Panu Matilainen]

Not possible. Traditionally all the generated dependencies have been strictly run-time dependencies and there has been no legit use-case, but if this meta-thing gets added, that situation changes somewhat.

In the meanwhile I also recalled some of the open questions surrounding this:
- any non-ordered dependency types in OrderWithRequires should optimally be errors or at least warnings because that just doesn't make any sense, currently the values are not sanity checked at all
- what combinations of pre/post/blaa and meta are legitimate?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1028#issuecomment-580620335
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20200130/cc1fea19/attachment.html>