[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Support ed25519 signatures (#1202)

[Michael Schroeder]

Things that need to be discussed:

- which signature header tags to (re-)use? (My preference is the gpg tags.)
- do we want to add `RPMRC_UNSUPPORTED` for unsupported algorithms/curves? Currently unsupported sigs are reported as bad, which is not nice.
- do we want to allow the import of unsupported pubkeys? We currently do not allow that, my preference is to keep it that way.

Bonus questions:

- what is RPMRC_NOTTRUSTED?
- what is `sinfo->sigalgo`? It does not seem to be set anywhere.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1202#issuecomment-625704348
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20200508/81ae8e2f/attachment-0001.html>