<p>The licensing situation is solvable: <a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ?rd=Licensing/FAQ#What.27s_the_deal_with_the_OpenSSL_license.3F">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ?rd=Licensing/FAQ#What.27s_the_deal_with_the_OpenSSL_license.3F</a></p>
<p>Short version: In Fedora, the legal team has come to the determination that the usage is within the spirit of the licenses, if not its specific letter. That said, RPM could also opt to add a license exception for OpenSSL, which is supported by the FSF.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/119#issuecomment-271254897">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANb805QFSRZ8qVwFsuxL36kOCoS0d7Owks5rQg-ggaJpZM4Ld19G">mute the thread</a>.<img alt="" height="1" src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ANb808rPbnB9ZCG-2XG1cwNmc_Issf-Oks5rQg-ggaJpZM4Ld19G.gif" width="1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
  <link itemprop="url" href="https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/119#issuecomment-271254897"></link>
  <meta itemprop="name" content="View Issue"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop="description" content="View this Issue on GitHub"></meta>
</div>

<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/rpm-software-management/rpm","title":"rpm-software-management/rpm","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@sgallagher in #119: The licensing situation is solvable: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ?rd=Licensing/FAQ#What.27s_the_deal_with_the_OpenSSL_license.3F\r\n\r\nShort version: In Fedora, the legal team has come to the determination that the usage is within the spirit of the licenses, if not its specific letter. That said, RPM could also opt to add a license exception for OpenSSL, which is supported by the FSF. "}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/119#issuecomment-271254897"}}}</script>