<p>First, I don't see why you need the rich deps here. Wouldn't a <code>libfoo.so.1(do_foo@FOO_1.0)(64bit))</code> requires be enough?</p>
<p>Then, wouldn't your proposal mean that over time you'll have a provide for every symbol? That'll be quite some burden on the metadata size and dependency solver setup. If you really want something like this you should look at altlinux's support of set-versions dependencies (IIRC).</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/362#issuecomment-345475643">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANb80zIOkC0t3nlm8FE-i5AdUz3pzfOkks5s31evgaJpZM4QjIbr">mute the thread</a>.<img alt="" height="1" src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ANb802C2q-Fek1K3bsPNO19Df_i86odMks5s31evgaJpZM4QjIbr.gif" width="1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
  <link itemprop="url" href="https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/362#issuecomment-345475643"></link>
  <meta itemprop="name" content="View Issue"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop="description" content="View this Issue on GitHub"></meta>
</div>

<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/rpm-software-management/rpm","title":"rpm-software-management/rpm","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@mlschroe in #362: First, I don't see why you need the rich deps here. Wouldn't a `libfoo.so.1(do_foo@FOO_1.0)(64bit))` requires be enough?\r\n\r\nThen, wouldn't your proposal mean that over time you'll have a provide for every symbol? That'll be quite some burden on the metadata size and dependency solver setup. If you really want something like this you should look at altlinux's support of set-versions dependencies (IIRC)."}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/362#issuecomment-345475643"}}}</script>