<p></p>
<p>That's a very valid point and one that I didn't consider, honestly.</p>
<p>A more user-friendly way of dealing with this would actually be the opposite, i.e. making the use of the priority keyword conditional at preprocessing, based on the detected OpenMP version (which is trivial to do as shown in the patch) because as you say, all that the keyword really does is it improves load balance a tiny little bit in specific circumstances. We could even avoid doing a <code>qsort()</code> on the package list as part of that conditional. Would that be better?</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1325#issuecomment-669953999">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADLPZU6UTFDNES7N3LRPKC3R7K3FTANCNFSM4PVPF73A">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ADLPZU7Y7NNTJLE6XWVIRODR7K3FTA5CNFSM4PVPF73KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOE7XK7TY.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1325#issuecomment-669953999",
"url": "https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1325#issuecomment-669953999",
"name": "View Pull Request"
},
"description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>