[Rpm-ecosystem] License names
Igor Gnatenko
i.gnatenko.brain at gmail.com
Fri Feb 12 12:22:53 UTC 2016
Hi folks,
I was thinking about License tag in RPM and we are using GPLv2, ASL 2.0 and
others as specified in Fedora wiki page with guidelines.
It is confusing: Why GPLv2 (with 'v' inside) and ASL 2.0 (without 'v'
inside)
Why we are not going to use names as defined in SPDX[0]? We are using SPDX
in AppStream-GLib for checking validity of license name in appstream
metadata[1].
What do you think about my idea? Should I prepare patches?
[0] https://spdx.org/licenses/
[1]
https://github.com/hughsie/appstream-glib/blob/688ce88229a1aaf9d285e6d8859e006fe4dfde2a/libappstream-glib/as-utils.c#L458
--
-Igor Gnatenko
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-ecosystem/attachments/20160212/88fcfed3/attachment.html>
More information about the Rpm-ecosystem
mailing list