[Rpm-ecosystem] libhif, and grand plans

[Honza Šilhan]

> From: "Richard Hughes" <hughsient at gmail.com>
> 
> On 13 July 2015 at 15:41, Daniel Mach <dmach at redhat.com> wrote:
> > If libhif should merge everything into a big blob without clearly scoped
> > interfaces, then we're in disagreement.
> 
> I think we're in agreement I think :)

The "low level" hawkey API will at some form still persist. Selector,
Querie, Subject etc. are there for reason and couldn't be replaced by high
level API.

> > All these should be available via Python interfaces.
> 
> Classic python, or GObjectIntrospection?

Does it matter? Either way we will ensure that the Python API will stay the same
(maybe we will rename hawkey module name). WRT creating new Python API from libhif
using GObjectIntrospection we will make it as much Pythonic as we can.

Honza