[Rpm-ecosystem] libhif, and grand plans

[Richard Hughes]

On 24 July 2015 at 16:48, Honza Šilhan <jsilhan at redhat.com> wrote:
> Mismatch doesn't seem good to me. We should have just one build tool otherwise it
> won't generate proper build subdirs (at least cmake). Hawkey, librepo, libcomps,
> libunfi and libsolv are taking advantage of CMake. Libhif is using Autools.

Right, and it's probably less work to convert libhif to cmake than the
other way around, although I have basically zero experience with
releasing projects with cmake.

Richard.