Buildroot being ignored

devzero2000 devzero2000 at rpm5.org
Thu Dec 4 13:29:37 UTC 2008


The "NEW" rpm functionality was implemented years ago from Jeff Johnson (
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/rpm-devel/2006-August/001348.html).

In RPM 5 (http://rpm5.org)  it work well

Also the test case (http://rpm.org/attachment/ticket/10/a.spec) work
correctly in RPM5.

Regards

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Panu Matilainen
<pmatilai at laiskiainen.org>wrote:

> On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Xavier Toth wrote:
>
> > My spec files which build on Fedora 9 rpm 4.4.2.3 don't build on
> > Fedora 10 rpm 4.6.0. It appears that the Buildroot definition is being
> > ignored. If I use --buildroot on the command line they build but this
> > isn't a good solution. Is this a rpmbuild bug or feature? Is it
> > specific to Fedora possibly?
>
> Buildroot from spec is ignored on purpose in rpm 4.6.0. That specs should
> (have to) define their own buildroot is simply bad design and a leftover
> from ancient times.
>
> There's one known bug wrt the new buildroot handling, namely that specs
> which have subpackages whose version differs from the main package
> version doesn't work right: http://rpm.org/ticket/10
>
>        - Panu -
> _______________________________________________
> Rpm-list mailing list
> Rpm-list at lists.rpm.org
> http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-list/attachments/20081204/33d22093/attachment.htm 


More information about the Rpm-list mailing list