Moderation test

[devzero2000]

What is the meaning of this ?

>
> Are truly rpm.org mailing list only for rpm-4-6 member, and, for it is
> more, only for Fedora, and not for "rpm" (quoted) user ? If so, please tell.
> Probably it is, but it hope it not. But, refusing jbj (Jeff Johnson) or
> giving it problem to contribuite at this lists, not it is a good thing for
> me (and for rpm imho).
>
>
>
> Panu, please, tell what is your position on this topic.
>
> Regards
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Jeff Johnson <n3npq at mac.com> wrote:
>
>> I've been told that my submissions to this list are moderated:
>>
>>
>> > Apologies for a messup with rpm-list at lists.rpm.org administration, I
>> only intended to enable moderation for your posts there but either I or
>> mailman screwed something up and unsubscribed you instead. I've resubscribed
>> you now.
>>
>>        - Panu -
>>
>> Let's see, shall we? Apologies to list members, posting publically is the
>> only trustworthy test of <rpm-list at rpm.org> mailing list moderation
>> policies.
>>
>> I have no wish to be moderated, nor participate where controlling rather
>> than disseminating information about rpm is considered more important.
>>
>> No reason for moderating my posts other than that "They can." has been
>> supplied.
>>
>> 73 de Jeff
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-list/attachments/20081217/996a0157/attachment.htm