What is $releasever
Jonathan Ryshpan
jonrysh at pacbell.net
Fri Feb 6 01:40:03 UTC 2009
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 00:19 +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 03:11:18PM -0800, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > I occasionally have to find repos on the web, using a browser. It helps
> > to know the values of $basearch and $releasever.
> >
> > It looks like basesearch=`uname -m`
> > but what is releasever?
> >
> > BTW: It would be nice if this were part of the yum man page or info
> > file.
>
> man yum.conf:
>
> $releasever
> This will be replaced with the value of the version of the pack-
> age listed in distroverpkg. This defaults to the version of
> ‘redhat-release’ package.
>
Foolish of me not to run "man yum.conf".
So let me play this back to you:
Man yum.conf tells me to look in distroverpkg. A short web search tells
me that this is an rpm, whose name can be found by running:
yum whatprovides redhat-release
Actually running this gives the output:
$ yum whatprovides redhat-release
fedora-release-10-1.noarch : Fedora release files
Repo : fedora
Matched from:
Other : redhat-release
generic-release-9.91-2.noarch : Generic release files
Repo : fedora
Matched from:
Other : redhat-release
generic-release-10-1.noarch : Generic release files
Repo : updates
Matched from:
Other : redhat-release
fedora-release-10-1.noarch : Fedora release files
Repo : installed
Matched from:
Other : Provides-match: redhat-release
Since I'm running Fedora-10, the last item looks like the right one, and
in fact:
$ rpm -q fedora-release-10
fedora-release-10-1.noarch
What's more:
$ rpm -qa '*release*'
rpmfusion-nonfree-release-10-1.noarch
adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch
fedora-release-10-1.noarch
rpmfusion-free-release-10-1.noarch
fedora-release-notes-10.0.0-1.noarch
doesn't show anything promising.
fedora-release-10-1.noarch contains a promising file:
$ cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 10 (Cambridge)
So I suspect that $releasever has the value "10", and not "f10" or
"fc10" or "Fedora-10", or whatever.
I'm sorry, but I think this is all about as clear as mud.
Thanks again - jon
More information about the Rpm-list
mailing list