[Rpm-maint] --resign fails?

[James Bowes]

Paul Nasrat wrote:

> I'd agree this is potentially a little confusing, a guide to signing
> would probably clarify.  In your case to ensure proper signing you could
> test %_signature != 'none' and then test the return code of the resign
> operation.

Would it be useful to have the output be more informative?

Like:
package_foo signed with gpg key bar_key_id
Or:
package_foo not signed since no default key supplied

-James