[Rpm-maint] --resign fails?

[seth vidal]

On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 09:16 -0500, James Bowes wrote:
> Paul Nasrat wrote:
> 
> > I'd agree this is potentially a little confusing, a guide to signing
> > would probably clarify.  In your case to ensure proper signing you could
> > test %_signature != 'none' and then test the return code of the resign
> > operation.
> 
> Would it be useful to have the output be more informative?
> 
> Like:
> package_foo signed with gpg key bar_key_id
> Or:
> package_foo not signed since no default key supplied
> 

yes and a little more clear. The capitalized vs non-capitalized thing
about which sigs are good or not is a really unclear, imo.

then again, maybe it's easier for all of that to be above rpm in another
little tool.

-sv