[Rpm-maint] [Suse patch] Tags backport

[seth vidal]

On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 15:08 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> I guess the big question here is if we want to try to stay compatible with 
> jbj rpm tags. Or more to the point, avoid overlapping, which does make 
> sense. But that only works if it happens both ways...
> 


It cannot work on the basis of what any random fork of rpm may decide to
do. That way lies madness. Take the best ideas and the most reasonable
ones and implement them based on the needs of the user base. That's it.
Do not worry about chasing compatibility with a fork that clearly has no
interest in the needs of the users you are working for.

-sv

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20070604/c2185685/attachment-0001.pgp