[Rpm-maint] [Suse patch] Test architecture in refresh
Panu Matilainen
pmatilai at redhat.com
Fri Jun 8 12:11:54 UTC 2007
Hmm.. I fail to see any behavior change with this patch, but maybe I'm
testing something else. This would seem to be related to the
nameversioncompare.diff to some extent - Michael?
- Panu -
---
Also test architecture in "refresh" test when not colored. This allows
updates to different architecture possible again.
--- ./lib/psm.c.orig 2005-12-14 18:59:10.000000000 +0000
+++ ./lib/psm.c 2006-02-24 11:46:54.000000000 +0000
@@ -1425,15 +1441,16 @@ rpmRC rpmpsmStage(rpmpsm psm, pkgStage s
assert(psm->mi == NULL);
psm->mi = rpmtsInitIterator(ts, RPMTAG_NAME, rpmteN(psm->te), 0);
+ /* this must match rpmNameVersionCompare in depends.c */
xx = rpmdbSetIteratorRE(psm->mi, RPMTAG_EPOCH, RPMMIRE_STRCMP,
rpmteE(psm->te));
xx = rpmdbSetIteratorRE(psm->mi, RPMTAG_VERSION, RPMMIRE_STRCMP,
rpmteV(psm->te));
xx = rpmdbSetIteratorRE(psm->mi, RPMTAG_RELEASE, RPMMIRE_STRCMP,
rpmteR(psm->te));
- if (tscolor) {
- xx = rpmdbSetIteratorRE(psm->mi, RPMTAG_ARCH, RPMMIRE_STRCMP,
+ xx = rpmdbSetIteratorRE(psm->mi, RPMTAG_ARCH, RPMMIRE_STRCMP,
rpmteA(psm->te));
+ if (tscolor) {
xx = rpmdbSetIteratorRE(psm->mi, RPMTAG_OS, RPMMIRE_STRCMP,
rpmteO(psm->te));
}
More information about the Rpm-maint
mailing list