[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: BuildRequires generator (#104)

[nim-nim]

@ffesti 

I thought the same thing as you at first but you don't absolutely need the separate BuildRequires syntax. You can perfectly limit static BuildRequires to the part needed to compute additional BuildRequires before `%build` and just add any static BuildRequires needed for %build or %check to the output of this computation.

(from a technical POW that's just putting those BuildRequires in an expand, and cat >> the result to the dynamic BuildRequires file)

So, from a technical POW, sure the separate syntax would be nice to have, but it's not absolutely *required*.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/104#issuecomment-432987623
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20181025/98ba862e/attachment.html>