[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] %buildarch does not reflect architecture of current %package declaration (#689)

[Panu Matilainen]

That such a macro gets defined at all is merely rpm going "oh lookit, there's a tag I know, lets define a corresponding macro for it". This is how %{name}, %{version} and all the other crud gets defined too. 
I don't see how you could legitimately *use* the %buildarch macro for anything at all so it probably shouldn't get defined either.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/689#issuecomment-489562312
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20190506/56c0d54e/attachment-0001.html>