[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Define shell to use with %() (#1334)

[Michal Domonkos]

@pmatilai good point. That being said, @Conan-Kudo has pointed out that we do in fact respect `%_buildshell` in other, non-build related areas as well. Doing a quick grep reveals for example:

`macros.in:%__spec_prep_shell    %{___build_shell}`

Still, that doesn't mean we should follow that trend, especially given that macro processing really is a separate step in the whole spec building process. Also, making `%()` suddenly use `%_buildshell` could cause unexpected things to happen in spec file which already redefine it. For consistency's sake, on the other hand, it would make sense to reuse it...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1334#issuecomment-675472264
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20200818/b85d900f/attachment.html>