[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM fsverity support (#1203)

[jessorensen]

> > RPM doesn't actually need the fsverity utility to be present, but it does need libfsverity
> 
> Yup, the library is what I meant by my comment, not the utility. Thanks for adding the check.
> 
> I'll need to take closer look at the updated version but overall I think its in fair shape for this point, and the added tags totally reasonable. So I'm considering the tags reserved, and there are no competing tag additions at the moment, but if it makes you sleep better we can certainly merge the tag addition right away to cement the reservation.

Sounds good, thanks for looking at it!

I think we can wait for the library to land. I pushed it into Fedora 32 for testing yesterday, so hopefully it will get out shortly:

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-2f41b015c0

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1203#issuecomment-645552077
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20200617/9d9f1ba2/attachment.html>