[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Enhanced checks and a fuzz harness (#1559)

[Demi Marie Obenour]

> @DemiMarie , I know you're trying to help and thanks for that, but please stop trying so hard :slightly_smiling_face:
> 
> When I said it's time to cool it and step back a little for a strategic regroup, it didn't mean that you should go and invent and implement a whole new strategy overnight. It meant that it's time to cool off a bit.

Will do, thanks!

> I'll look into this, in time. In the meanwhile, please don't submit more patches of this type. I know it's a kind of strange thing to ask, but I can't work like this, the review queue is already flooded and so am I. A tell-tale sign is that we've managed to introduce almost as many regressions in the review process as there were issues fixed. I guess I'm trying to say that I need to look at this in my own way and pace.

Thanks for explaining this!  Code review is hard work and I totally understand not having enough time to do it.  This is old, complex, and poorly tested code with significant implications for both security and compatibility.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1559#issuecomment-788237934
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20210301/13f42d1c/attachment-0001.html>