[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpmsign: support EdDSA signatures (#1571)

[Demi Marie Obenour]

> It certainly is not an RSA signature. See the discussion in #1202 and related.
> As the multiple signature support work hasn't progressed anywhere (and it wont anytime soon), perhaps we should consider just reusing the DSA tag for this afterall. I guess that's what @mlschroe originally had in mind?

I don’t particularly care which tag is used, so long as it works.  Can we eliminate the distinction in RPMv6?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1571#issuecomment-795967692
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20210310/7286b568/attachment-0001.html>