[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add support for generating buildinfo file as subpackage (#1532)

[Hartmut Goebel]

@Conan-Kudo I strongly recommends using the Debianisic names, as this simplifies tooling. Having different names, in addition to already requiring different packaging tools, makes tooling for reproducibility even harder.

Yes, this makes names not match the RPM style. Anyhow, there is no use in creating yet another format, just for this reason. If the format is the same, tooling could share most of the code. I the format and names are diverging, this would require a lot of work adapting existing tooling. This will waste a lot of valuable and rare developer time.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1532#issuecomment-973101681
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20211118/f323311a/attachment.html>