[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add support for generating buildinfo file as subpackage (#1532)

[Neal Gompa (ニール・ゴンパ)]

> @Conan-Kudo I strongly recommends using the Debianisic names, as this simplifies tooling. Having different names, in addition to already requiring different packaging tools, makes tooling for reproducibility even harder.
> 

I am not willing to allow us to be boxed into Debian-isms. It will cause problems for us.

> Yes, this makes names not match the RPM style. Anyhow, there is no use in creating yet another format, just for this reason. If the format is the same, tooling could share most of the code. I the format and names are diverging, this would require a lot of work adapting existing tooling. This will waste a lot of valuable and rare developer time.

And you'd be wasting ours to map RPM semantics to Debian ones. Our tooling works in RPM conventions and semantics, which are different than Debian.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1532#issuecomment-973108484
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20211118/da4990f9/attachment.html>