[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Make rpm-sequoia part of the rpm-software-management project on GitHub (Issue #2164)

[Neal H. Walfield]

> It'd be welcome here, certainly. A thing like this is good to have close to home, but then rpm-sequoia has two fairly obvious homes sweat_smile I think the question is whether it's better from rpm-sequoia maintenance POV, ie whatever works best for you.

Indeed :).  I think rpm is the better home.  I'll investigate moving the project.

> It may well even make sense to have it as a (git) submodule/subtree/similar of rpm. I'm not deeply aware of the technical implications of those, so just a thought.

Interesting idea.  I'll take a look.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2164#issuecomment-1231281470
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2164/1231281470 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20220830/7988c4ef/attachment.html>