[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Reflinkable content format (Discussion #2126)

[Ludwig Nussel]

#1470 by @malmond77 introduced a format for reflinkable rpm payload. It adds an extra metadata block at the end of the payload. That doesn't seem to be needed actually. I wrote this tool to produce content without extra metadata: https://github.com/lnussel/rpm2extents

Even if support for this kind of package won't make it into rpm any time soon, I wonder whether we could agree on the potential payload format already?

WDYT?

CC @chantra

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2126
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/2126 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20220714/23377f68/attachment.html>