[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Year 2038 plan for rpm (#1084)

[Daniel Alley]

>Hmm, actually the timestamps are uint32_t so they should be good until 2106, but this does need a proper investigation, and ultimately, move to 64bit types.

Just the timestamps, or all tag values?  The [docs](https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/master/docs/manual/tags.md#scalar-types) say that **all** tags are unsigned, but as mentioned on https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1228 the type handling is pretty inconsistent, and the value itself is stored in an `int32_t`.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1084#issuecomment-1328451046
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1084/1328451046 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20221127/0fcf7dd3/attachment.html>