[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Separate tags for SRC and binary RPM (Discussion #2228)

[Panu Matilainen]

For license, we recently added separate SourceLicense tag. BuildArch is far trickier as it send the spec parser to recurse with all manner of funny side-effects, I'm not sure that is solvable within the existing spec syntax because of all the historic quirks involved.

Allowing a "sub-package" to share the main package name may get around some while introducing others. 


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2228#discussioncomment-3894881
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/2228/comments/3894881 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20221017/eee56e19/attachment.html>