[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add CI job for the rpm-sequoia backend (Issue #2065)

[Panu Matilainen]

It's cost, but in a wider meaning than just dollars and euros. We're currently only testing the default setup, and going beyond that opens an unpleasant box of permutations that we'd need to test just as desperately, including but not limited to the different rpmdb backends. The more material cost is SemaphoreCI quota, we've been considering moving to GH Actions instead to have it all here (resistance seems futile, if you catch my drift :sweat_smile: )

So what I'm currently thinking is that once the dust settles a bit, we'll just switch the Sequoia to be the default on CI and punt the permutations issue again.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2065#issuecomment-1237733334
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2065/1237733334 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20220905/a03c7429/attachment.html>