[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPMv6 proposal: treat IMA and fsverity signatures as part of the package (Issue #2200)

[Panu Matilainen]

That's how IMA signatures originally worked but I changed it because it violates rpm's principles.
I'm quite aware having the current solution isn't optimal, but this isn't the solution.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2200#issuecomment-1254590606
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2200/1254590606 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20220921/0033bceb/attachment.html>