[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM v6 package format, first public draft for commenting (Discussion #2374)
Panu Matilainen
notifications at github.com
Thu Feb 23 10:53:15 UTC 2023
I'm all for properly supporting multi-arch in packages (the multiarch deps are even mentioned in the v6 spec here), but getting rid of "arch" is likely to be, uh, complicated. Even if rpm itself could, the repodata and every single depsolver out there has very deeply wired assumptions about that.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2374#discussioncomment-5087091
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/2374/comments/5087091 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20230223/82e80feb/attachment.html>
More information about the Rpm-maint
mailing list