[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm should not use short gpg key ids in messages (Issue #2403)

[Panu Matilainen]

Yep, various things do parse that "informational" warning from rpm and will break if changed. Doesn't mean we can never change it, just that we need to be mindful of doing so.

I remember starting towards "use fingerprints everywhere" goal once upon a time but ran into sufficient obstacles to get sidetracked / gave up / something to that effect. The biggest obstacle of them all was probably the `gpg-pubkey` entries in the rpmdb, with all manner of things expecting the exact version/release "semantics".

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2403#issuecomment-1449961594
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2403/1449961594 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20230301/26c274fd/attachment.html>